FSSP Rad Trad Convert Joshua Charles: WHAT IS THE “RESTRAINER” HOLDING BACK THE COMING OF ANTICHRIST (2 THESS. 2)?
FSSP Alexander Tschugguel & FSSP Taylor Marshall
Joshua Charles is a convert to the FSSP Latin Mass.
The Forerunner to the Antichrist is FSSP Alexander Tschugguel who is also a convert.
FSSP Taylor Marshall is a convert to the FSSP Latin Mass.
I thought that Taylor Marshall was the False Prophet to the Forerunner to the Antichrist.
But Marshall has not done anything recently to point out the "Great Monarch" Alexander Tschugguel.
The FSSP and Taylor Marshall has to lie and mislead the world into accepting Alexander Tschugguel as the "Great Monarch".
In order to do this the FSSP & Marshall has to lie about the Restrainer found in (2 Thess. 2).
Marshall is not doing this.
The only voice that is misleading the world in declaring that Restrainer is not the Divinely Ordained Authority of the Holy Roman Emperor once pagan now Catholic is FSSP Rad Trad Convert Joshua Charles.
FSSP Rad Trad Convert Joshua Charles is obstinate in denying that the Restrainer is the Divinely Ordained Authority of the Holy Roman Emperor once pagan now Catholic.
The Church Fathers are unanimous in declaring that that Restrainer is the Divinely Ordained Authority of the Holy Roman Emperor once pagan now Catholic.
Joshua Charles himself has declared that if the Church Fathers are unanimous in one thing then one has to accept it as Church teaching/dogma.
But when it comes to the Church Fathers unanimously declaring that that Restrainer is the Divinely Ordained Authority of the Holy Roman Emperor once pagan now Catholic - Joshua Charles denies it - obstinately so.
Joshua Charles is a heretic for this. Joshua Charles is deceitful. Just as the FSSP is.
I'm now realizing that Joshua Charles must be the false prophet to the Forerunner to the Antichrist - Alexander Tschugguel.
What's the big deal?
Well there will be a Forerunner to the Antichrist as Our Lady had said:
"A forerunner of the Antichrist, with his troops drawn from many nations, will wage war against the true Christ, sole Savior of the world; he will shed much blood and will seek to annihilate the cult of God so as to be regarded as a god." Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)
We no longer have a Restrainer. Therefore the Forerunner to the Antichrist will be made manifest first.
This what the FSSP and Joshua Charles want to hide from the world.
Here is his tweet
WHAT IS THE “RESTRAINER” HOLDING BACK THE COMING OF ANTICHRIST (2 THESS. 2)?
Some of St. Paul’s most enigmatic words are about the “restrainer” that/who holds back the coming of Antichrist. He mentions it in 2 Thessalonians 2:
“And you know WHAT IS RESTRAINING HIM now so that he may be revealed in his time. For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only HE WHO NOW RESTRAINS IT will do so until he is out of the way. And then the lawless one [Antichrist] will be revealed…” (2 Thess. 2:6-8).
I refer to the “restrainer” as “that” and “who” because that is how St. Paul refers to it: as both a neuter “it,” and a singular “he.”
In my upcoming book on the end times, I will make the case that the “restrainer,” or “katechōn,” which holds back Antichrist consists of four elements:
(1) The Catholic Church
(2) Christendom (spiritual/temporal powers)
(3) The Papacy
(4) The Eucharist
The reasons why are too much to get into here. Suffice it to say, it is fascinating. I’m definitely building on the work of many others over the centuries, and to the extent I can make a contribution to answering this mystery, it will only be because of these giants of the past.
Many of the Church Fathers believed the “restrainer” was in some sense Roman. The book of Daniel, which informed the patristic reading of 2 Thess. 2, also has various sections that speak of the Roman Empire, the founding of the Church during its imperium, its being given to the saints of the Church, and—apparently—its near total destruction prior to the end (the “shattering of the power of the holy people” in Dan. 12:7).
Those are just some hints of where I’ll be going.
My conclusions could be wrong—I hold them loosely, as the Church has not authoritatively made any of this a matter of dogma. However, I believe some of the conclusions I’ve reached—along with the reasoning behind it—will be very interesting, and hopefully eye-opening for many people. My research began in 2020 just prior to the COVID lockdowns (auspicious timing!), and it’s only gotten more and more interesting from there.
Please pray for me as I continue to work on the research and writing for this and another book on a similar topic, both of which will hopefully be released this year.
For another fascinating book on the biblical basis for the Roman nature of Christ’s Church, I highly recommend my friend Dr. Alan Fimister’s recently released book, “The Iron Scepter of the Son of Man: Romanitas as a Note of the Church” (2023). Source