Pope Francis Declares War On Jesus Christ Crucified For Lent: Claims Crucifixes Are Not Needed In Churches & The Crucifix IS NOT A ROMAN CATHOLIC SYMBOL!
Hater Of The Crucifix
“The Cross is not an ornament that we must always put in the churches, there on the altar. It is not a symbol that distinguishes us from others. Pope FrancisThe Crucifix better distinguish you from the rest, if not, then you're not a Roman Catholic.
The Jews, Muslims, Protestants, Freemasons, Atheists & other assorted godless souls do not possess a crucifix. Only Roman Catholics possess the crucifix. The Crucifix is Roman Catholic.
The very first person in the world to make a crucifix was St Mary Magdalene:
The Penitent Magdalene
St Mary Magdalene was there at the Crucifixion and she wanted to meditate day and night on the Passion of Christ and this was the reason why she made the first crucifix.
Remember when you pick up a crucifix to meditate on the passion you are following the example first given by St Mary Magdalene.
A couple of things to note:
Pope Francis is a hater of the crucifix because his friends the Jews, Muslims, Protestants, Freemasons, Atheists & other assorted godless souls hate the crucifix. And Pope Francis would rather have the praise and love of the Jews, Muslims, Protestants, Freemasons, Atheists & other assorted godless souls than he would of Jesus Christ Crucified. This is why Pope Francis has declared a war on the crucifix.
Pope Francis aims to remove the crucifix from the lives of Roman Catholics.
You can always tell a heretic and a bad Catholic by the absence of the crucifix.
There better be a crucifix in the church you attend Mass, if not, go to a church that has a crucifix.
Any church that does not have a crucifix is a church of Pope Francis.
Pope Francis is slowing destroying the faith and morals of the church and he is set out to destroy the traditions of the church, and what will Pope Francis replace it with?
Let William of Ockham make that prophecy:
Master: Let us assume that someone accuses another before the pope of being a heretic because the accused supposedly holds and asserts that the Christian faith is false, that the law of the Muslims should be embraced, and that Christ was a prophet both false and discredited. After the accusation and the ensuing judicial process, the pope renders a definitive judgement to the effect that the person accused is not a heretic because all of the aforementioned theses stated and asserted by him are true.
Student: Although this is a case that never happened and perhaps never will, I find it difficult to assert that it smacks of impossibility. For it seems that one cannot clearly demonstrate either by Holy Writ or by the doctrine of the church that no future pope will be the Antichrist. It is indeed probable that many Christians through their ancestors who were converted to the faith have long established roots to the tribe of Dan, from which some believe that the Antichrist will be born [For a discussion of this tradition see David Burr, Olivi's Peaceable Kingdom, Philadelphia 1993, p. 150]. And even in our time it is quite possible for someone from that tribe to accept the Christian faith, to have a son born to him, that son being subsequently elected pope, and afterwards clearly showing himself to be the Antichrist. And thus it cannot be known whether some Christian and future pope, with roots in the tribe of Dan, will be the Antichrist. It is, however, established that the Antichrist will unambiguously teach that the law of the Christians is false and that Christ was a false prophet. And the described case does not appear impossible because it is not known that no future pope will submit to the sect of the Muslims. For it may come to pass that even a pope who was at first catholic would begin to consider that the sect of the Muslims was better than the law of the Christians. This pope could initially develop such a strong secret friendship with the Muslims, that having summoned their military might to his side he would dare to openly assert that the Christian law was false and unjust, and force Christians to accept the law of the Muslims. Since it is indeed an established fact that many Christians (including clerks and religious) have been converted to the sect of the Muslims, it does not seem implausible that even a pope might arrive at such a huge insanity. For since a pope is not confirmed in faith (just as no others are), the same point must be contended in his case as is in that of others as to the possibility of being converted to the Muslims. Having therefore presented the suggested exemplary case, proceed to argue in favour of the aforementioned assertion. - William Of Ockham
“In the year 1864, Lucifer together with a large number of demons will be unloosed from hell; they will put an end to faith little by little, even in those dedicated to God. They will blind them in such a way, that, unless they are blessed with a special grace, these people will take on the spirit of these angels of hell; several religious institutions will lose all faith and will lose many souls.Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)
Several will abandon the faith, and a great number of priests and members of religious orders will break away from the true religion; among these people there will even be bishops. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)
"Francis / Bishop of Rome."
Francis The Destroyer
For In Those Days Jesus Christ Will Send Them Not A True Pastor, But A Destroyer ~ St. Francis