Ann Barnhardt Declares Anyone Who Accepts Bergoglio As The Pope Is EFFEMINATE!


Crazy Jew Ann:

One of the arguments you will hear effeminates make, desperately trying to avoid acknowledging the reality of the Bergoglian Antipapacy qua Antipapacy, is that Bergoglio is the Pope because he is “peacefully and universally accepted” as such by The Church. More>>>>>>>

Hey JEWESS Ann does that include your Priest who prays for Pope Francis during the Te Itgur?  Is your Latin Mass saying priest effeminate?

Do you verbally abuse your effeminate Latin Mass saying priest?


  1. Lol. I think you try to compete with her over who can seem crazier!

    (Don't worry, you're leading by a mile. Lol)

    1. Hey! Is Pope Francis the POPE?

      Yes or no

      Please answer


  2. My opinion is worthless. What matters is teaching of St Robert Bellarmine, Doctor of the Church. These are his words:

    Finally, the Holy Fathers teach unanimously not only that heretics are outside of the Church, but also that they are “ipso facto” deprived of all ecclesiastical jurisdiction and dignity. St. Cyprian (lib. 2, epist. 6) says: “We affirm that absolutely no heretic or schismatic has any power or right”; and he also teaches (lib. 2, epist. 1) that the heretics who return to the Church must be received as laymen, even though they have been formerly priests or bishops in the Church. St. Optatus (lib. 1 cont. Parmen.) teaches that heretics and schismatics cannot have the keys of the kingdom of heaven, nor bind nor loose. St. Ambrose (lib. 1 de poenit., ca. 2), St. Augustine (in Enchir., cap 65), St. Jerome (lib. cont. Lucifer.) teach the same.

    1. any time St Robert Bellarmine is mentioned in this matter its always a!

  3. Do you agree with his teaching? Or can you find any other Doctor of the Church who has said anything that could support the hypothesis that Bergoglio is the pope?

    1. Sure how 'bout TWO high priests who sat in judgement of Christ?

      That's TWO.

      There you go.

  4. I'm not sure I follow your argument here. Can you please cite a statement from a Doctor of the Church that supports the idea that Bergoglio is the Pope?

    Besides, only one of the high priests who judged Christ had any jurisdiction. The other one was retired. Caiphas was the reigning high priest at the time and he sent Our Lord to his father in law Annas out of respect, so that Annas could also take a turn gloating over Our Lord and mocking Him.

    But if you want to use this information to bolster your claim that Bergoglio is the Pope, can you please cite some authority to back it up.

    1. I cited scripture.

      I did not add nor subtract from scripture.

      There were TWO High Priests that sat in judgement of Christ:

      Under the high priests Annas and Caiphas; the word of the Lord was made unto John, the son of Zachary, in the desert." [Luke 3:2]

      And they led him away to Annas first, for he was father in law to Caiphas, who was the high priest of that year." [John 18:13]

      And Annas sent him bound to Caiphas the high priest." [John 18:24]

      And Annas the high priest, and Caiphas, and John, and Alexander, and as many as were of the kindred of the high priest." [Acts Of Apostles 4:6]

      You can say that One High priest was passive and one active.

      Just like today.

      Pope Benedict is passive (spiritual) Pope Francis is active (temporal)

      We have two popes because there is no Temporal Authority to rule the world

      Pope Francis plays the part of the emperor. Pope Francis has usurped what belongs to the Divinely Ordained of the Holy Roman Emperor.

      You lose.


Post a Comment